staging: rtl8192u: delete successive assignments to the same location

Author: Jiayi Ye <yejiayily@gmail.com>

Successive assignments to the same location is meaningless and can be
deleted. The Coccinelle semantic patch was used to find cases.

@@
expression e1,e2,e3;
@@

(
 (<+...e1++...+>)=e2;
|
 (<+...e1--...+>)=e2;
|
 (<+...++e1...+>)=e2;
|
 (<+...--e1...+>)=e2;
|
e1=e2;
e1 = <+...e1...+>;
|
*e1=e2;
*e1=e3;
)

Signed-off-by: Jiayi Ye 
Reviewed-by: Josh Triplett 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman 
---
 drivers/staging/rtl8192u/r8192U_dm.c | 8 --------
 1 file changed, 8 deletions(-)
 
diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8192u/r8192U_dm.c b/drivers/staging/rtl8192u/r8192U_dm.c
index cf4d3dc..936565d 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/rtl8192u/r8192U_dm.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8192u/r8192U_dm.c
@@ -1476,14 +1476,12 @@ static void dm_CCKTxPowerAdjust_TSSI(struct net_device *dev, bool  bInCH14)
 
 		rtl8192_setBBreg(dev, rCCK0_TxFilter1, bMaskHWord, TempVal);
 		//Write 0xa24 ~ 0xa27
-		TempVal = 0;
 		TempVal =	priv->cck_txbbgain_table[priv->cck_present_attentuation].ccktxbb_valuearray[2] +
 					(priv->cck_txbbgain_table[priv->cck_present_attentuation].ccktxbb_valuearray[3]<<8) +
 					(priv->cck_txbbgain_table[priv->cck_present_attentuation].ccktxbb_valuearray[4]<<16)+
 					(priv->cck_txbbgain_table[priv->cck_present_attentuation].ccktxbb_valuearray[5]<<24);
 		rtl8192_setBBreg(dev, rCCK0_TxFilter2, bMaskDWord, TempVal);
 		//Write 0xa28  0xa29
-		TempVal = 0;
 		TempVal =	priv->cck_txbbgain_table[priv->cck_present_attentuation].ccktxbb_valuearray[6] +
 					(priv->cck_txbbgain_table[priv->cck_present_attentuation].ccktxbb_valuearray[7]<<8) ;
 
@@ -1496,14 +1494,12 @@ static void dm_CCKTxPowerAdjust_TSSI(struct net_device *dev, bool  bInCH14)
 
 		rtl8192_setBBreg(dev, rCCK0_TxFilter1, bMaskHWord, TempVal);
 		//Write 0xa24 ~ 0xa27
-		TempVal = 0;
 		TempVal =	priv->cck_txbbgain_ch14_table[priv->cck_present_attentuation].ccktxbb_valuearray[2] +
 					(priv->cck_txbbgain_ch14_table[priv->cck_present_attentuation].ccktxbb_valuearray[3]<<8) +
 					(priv->cck_txbbgain_ch14_table[priv->cck_present_attentuation].ccktxbb_valuearray[4]<<16)+
 					(priv->cck_txbbgain_ch14_table[priv->cck_present_attentuation].ccktxbb_valuearray[5]<<24);
 		rtl8192_setBBreg(dev, rCCK0_TxFilter2, bMaskDWord, TempVal);
 		//Write 0xa28  0xa29
-		TempVal = 0;
 		TempVal =	priv->cck_txbbgain_ch14_table[priv->cck_present_attentuation].ccktxbb_valuearray[6] +
 					(priv->cck_txbbgain_ch14_table[priv->cck_present_attentuation].ccktxbb_valuearray[7]<<8) ;
 
@@ -1528,7 +1524,6 @@ static void dm_CCKTxPowerAdjust_ThermalMeter(struct net_device *dev,	bool  bInCH
 		RT_TRACE(COMP_POWER_TRACKING, "CCK not chnl 14, reg 0x%x = 0x%x\n",
 			rCCK0_TxFilter1, TempVal);
 		//Write 0xa24 ~ 0xa27
-		TempVal = 0;
 		TempVal =	CCKSwingTable_Ch1_Ch13[priv->CCK_index][2] +
 					(CCKSwingTable_Ch1_Ch13[priv->CCK_index][3]<<8) +
 					(CCKSwingTable_Ch1_Ch13[priv->CCK_index][4]<<16)+
@@ -1537,7 +1532,6 @@ static void dm_CCKTxPowerAdjust_ThermalMeter(struct net_device *dev,	bool  bInCH
 		RT_TRACE(COMP_POWER_TRACKING, "CCK not chnl 14, reg 0x%x = 0x%x\n",
 			rCCK0_TxFilter2, TempVal);
 		//Write 0xa28  0xa29
-		TempVal = 0;
 		TempVal =	CCKSwingTable_Ch1_Ch13[priv->CCK_index][6] +
 					(CCKSwingTable_Ch1_Ch13[priv->CCK_index][7]<<8) ;
 
@@ -1556,7 +1550,6 @@ static void dm_CCKTxPowerAdjust_ThermalMeter(struct net_device *dev,	bool  bInCH
 		RT_TRACE(COMP_POWER_TRACKING, "CCK chnl 14, reg 0x%x = 0x%x\n",
 			rCCK0_TxFilter1, TempVal);
 		//Write 0xa24 ~ 0xa27
-		TempVal = 0;
 		TempVal =	CCKSwingTable_Ch14[priv->CCK_index][2] +
 					(CCKSwingTable_Ch14[priv->CCK_index][3]<<8) +
 					(CCKSwingTable_Ch14[priv->CCK_index][4]<<16)+
@@ -1565,7 +1558,6 @@ static void dm_CCKTxPowerAdjust_ThermalMeter(struct net_device *dev,	bool  bInCH
 		RT_TRACE(COMP_POWER_TRACKING, "CCK chnl 14, reg 0x%x = 0x%x\n",
 			rCCK0_TxFilter2, TempVal);
 		//Write 0xa28  0xa29
-		TempVal = 0;
 		TempVal =	CCKSwingTable_Ch14[priv->CCK_index][6] +
 					(CCKSwingTable_Ch14[priv->CCK_index][7]<<8) ;