staging: gdm72xx: use list_move instead of list_del/list_add
Author: Wei Yongjun <yongjun_wei@trendmicro.com.cn>
Using list_move() instead of list_del() + list_add().
spatch with a semantic match is used to found this problem.
(http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/)
Signed-off-by: Wei Yongjun
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman
---
drivers/staging/gdm72xx/gdm_usb.c | 3 +--
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/staging/gdm72xx/gdm_usb.c b/drivers/staging/gdm72xx/gdm_usb.c
index 932a797..41e08a7 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/gdm72xx/gdm_usb.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/gdm72xx/gdm_usb.c
@@ -186,8 +186,7 @@ static struct usb_rx *get_rx_struct(struct rx_cxt *rx)
/* Before this function is called, spin lock should be locked. */
static void put_rx_struct(struct rx_cxt *rx, struct usb_rx *r)
{
- list_del(&r->list);
- list_add(&r->list, &rx->free_list);
+ list_move(&r->list, &rx->free_list);
}
static int init_usb(struct usbwm_dev *udev) |
---
drivers/staging/gdm72xx/gdm_usb.c | 3 +--
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/staging/gdm72xx/gdm_usb.c b/drivers/staging/gdm72xx/gdm_usb.c
index 932a797..41e08a7 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/gdm72xx/gdm_usb.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/gdm72xx/gdm_usb.c
@@ -186,8 +186,7 @@ static struct usb_rx *get_rx_struct(struct rx_cxt *rx)
/* Before this function is called, spin lock should be locked. */
static void put_rx_struct(struct rx_cxt *rx, struct usb_rx *r)
{
- list_del(&r->list);
- list_add(&r->list, &rx->free_list);
+ list_move(&r->list, &rx->free_list);
}
static int init_usb(struct usbwm_dev *udev)