bonding: Return correct error code
Author: Amitoj Kaur Chawla <amitoj1606@gmail.com>
The return value of kzalloc on failure of allocation of memory should
be -ENOMEM and not -1.
Found using Coccinelle. A simplified version of the semantic patch
used is:
//
@@
expression *e;
@@
e = kzalloc(...);
if (e == NULL) {
...
return
- -1
+ -ENOMEM
;
}
//
The single call site only checks that the return value is not 0,
hence no change is required at the call site.
Signed-off-by: Amitoj Kaur Chawla
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller
---
drivers/net/bonding/bond_alb.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_alb.c b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_alb.c
index bb9e9fc..c5ac160 100644
--- a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_alb.c
+++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_alb.c
@@ -159,7 +159,7 @@ static int tlb_initialize(struct bonding *bond)
new_hashtbl = kzalloc(size, GFP_KERNEL);
if (!new_hashtbl)
- return -1;
+ return -ENOMEM;
spin_lock_bh(&bond->mode_lock); |
---
drivers/net/bonding/bond_alb.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_alb.c b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_alb.c
index bb9e9fc..c5ac160 100644
--- a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_alb.c
+++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_alb.c
@@ -159,7 +159,7 @@ static int tlb_initialize(struct bonding *bond)
new_hashtbl = kzalloc(size, GFP_KERNEL);
if (!new_hashtbl)
- return -1;
+ return -ENOMEM;
spin_lock_bh(&bond->mode_lock);